Language

Verify UI language preference (beta).

English Español

Community skill lab

Mini-Courses and Pattern Quizzes

Short training blocks for conflict mediation, family coaching, multilingual civility, and officiant ethics.

Community lessons Lessons hub Programs

Conflict Mediation Mini-Courses

Each module is short, practical, and designed for immediate field use.

18 min

Conflict mediation: first five minutes

Focus: De-escalation and frame reset

Separate people from positions before proposing solutions.
Switch from accusation language to shared-problem language.
Set a visible short-term agreement both sides can accept.

Practice drill: Use the 3-step opener: reflect, reframe, and request one concrete next action.

16 min

Conflict mediation: repair after a bad exchange

Focus: Accountability and trust repair

Own your part without weakening boundaries.
Request repair terms that are specific and time-bound.
Document agreements to avoid repeat ambiguity.

Practice drill: Write a two-sentence repair statement: impact acknowledged + next-step commitment.

15 min

Conflict mediation: boundary without humiliation

Focus: Firm boundaries without public shaming

Issue boundary statements without insult or escalation.
Use private correction before public enforcement when possible.
Escalate consequences predictably and proportionally.

Practice drill: Draft a boundary script that is clear, brief, and enforceable.

Parent/Guardian Education Modules

Practical scripts for teaching children and teens evidence-first disagreement habits.

14 min

Parent/guardian: de-escalation at home

Focus: Model calm correction and boundary language for children/teens.

Coach disagreement without humiliation.
Use one-sentence reset prompts during conflict spikes.
Set repeatable family standards for online tone.

At-home drill: Run a 5-minute family reset script after one heated exchange.

17 min

Parent/guardian: source literacy for families

Focus: Teach kids how to verify claims before sharing.

Distinguish primary source vs repost commentary.
Use a simple source chain checklist for viral content.
Normalize 'not sure yet' language when evidence is thin.

At-home drill: Review one trending claim and trace the primary source together.

15 min

Parent/guardian: repair language after harm

Focus: Turn blame cycles into accountability and repair commitments.

Acknowledge harm without self-erasure.
Request one measurable repair action and due date.
Build a no-insults household standard with follow-through.

At-home drill: Draft a two-part apology: impact ownership + next corrective step.

Multilingual Civility Content Packs

Reusable, evidence-first phrasing starters for mixed-language community support.

EN

English civility pack

Starter: I may be wrong; here is the evidence I can verify.

Can we verify this with one primary source before escalating?
This conflicts with record [ID/date] and needs correction.
Requested resolution: one owner, one due date, one measurable fix.

ES

Spanish civility pack

Starter: Puedo estar equivocado; aqui esta la evidencia verificable.

Podemos verificar esto con una fuente primaria antes de escalar?
Esto entra en conflicto con el registro [ID/fecha].
Resolucion solicitada: un responsable, una fecha, una correccion medible.

FR

French civility pack

Starter: Je peux me tromper; voici les faits verifiables.

Peut-on verifier avec une source primaire avant d'escalader?
Cela contredit le dossier [ID/date] et doit etre corrige.
Resolution demandee: un responsable, une date, une action mesurable.

HT

Haitian Creole civility pack

Starter: M ka twonpe; men prèv mwen ka verifye yo.

Eske nou ka verifye sa ak yon sous prensipal avan nou monte nivo a?
Sa pa mache ak dosye [ID/dat] la; tanpri verifye li.
Rezolisyon mwen mande: yon responsab, yon dat limit, yon koreksyon mezurab.

Misinformation Pattern-Recognition Quizzes

Use these drills to build source discipline before sharing claims publicly.

Pattern quiz: source-chain integrity

Spot when claims rely on circular sourcing, cropped evidence, or anonymous escalation.

Q1. A screenshot cites a "study" but links only to reposts of the same screenshot. Best response?

Share it with a caution note and let others decide. Pause and locate the primary source before amplifying. Assume it is true if multiple accounts posted it.

Q2. A dramatic clip omits beginning/end context. What is the most reliable next step?

Search for the full video and timestamp context. Trust comments from high-follower accounts. Ignore context because the core claim feels obvious.

Pattern quiz: emotional hijack vs evidence

Differentiate persuasive outrage from verifiable claims.

Q1. A post uses urgent language and insults dissenters but provides no verifiable references.

Treat urgency as proof of legitimacy. Ask for evidence standards before accepting the claim. Forward it to warn others immediately.

Q2. Two claims conflict. One includes public records and dates; the other has only anecdotes. Which is stronger?

The anecdotal claim, because it feels personal. Both are equal because disagreement exists. The record-backed claim, pending source quality checks.

Pattern quiz: coordinated narrative signals

Learn the common signatures of synchronized misinformation pushes.

Q1. Many accounts post near-identical wording within minutes, each linking the same short URL.

Likely organic conversation. Potential coordination signal; require stricter verification. Proof the claim is true because it is widespread.

Q2. A claim spikes only in one platform cluster and disappears when asked for sources.

Treat as high confidence due to virality. Mark as uncertain and avoid amplification until verified. Assume suppression proves authenticity.

Real-World Officiant Ethics Case Studies

Scenario drills for ceremony integrity, consent protection, and standing discipline.

Emergency ceremony request with missing docs

Scenario: Family requests immediate ceremony, but legal identity and witness documents are incomplete.

Primary risk: Legal validity + later dispute risk

Best action: Pause filing actions, run minimum identity/witness checklist, and document informed consent before proceeding.

Reflection prompt: Which parts can be pastoral now, and which parts must wait for legal integrity checks?

Gift pressure and perceived favoritism

Scenario: A high-profile family offers a large gift while asking for exceptions to filing/order-of-service rules.

Primary risk: Ethics conflict + coercion optics

Best action: Decline conditional gifts, log conflict disclosure, and apply the same documented standards as every other ceremony.

Reflection prompt: How do you preserve impartiality while remaining respectful and pastoral?

Consent ambiguity during vows

Scenario: One participant appears hesitant, and statements from relatives conflict about readiness.

Primary risk: Consent integrity + trauma/legal exposure

Best action: Stop the ceremony flow, move to private consent confirmation, and resume only with explicit documented assent.

Reflection prompt: What immediate pause language protects dignity while preventing harm?